![]() ![]() Most of it is owned by the Saudis and the Chinese, and MNE's, and a bit is still maintained by the Royal Family. The UK is the UK in name only for all practical purposes. However, it may not even matter as so much property is owned by outsiders, that it probably doesn't make a shred of difference anymore. Until other nations show reasonable tolerance of British females, she may want to be quite careful as to who she continues to let through the ports of the UK, which are not even controlled by the UK anymore. Even though I could feel sorry for her in not being acknowledged by even the British news with her proper title, she wouldn't get any position with any power outside of England. I doubt if she'd be an overnight wonder, running for Prime Minister of the Saudi Empire. Maybe she should see how far she gets by applying for a visa, and a job there. She won't have to worry at all about seeking any recourse through any grievance. Hopefully she can move to Dubai and see how much power she really has living there. If she does not recognize the significance of the English language, fine. On the left, democratic socialists like Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont took out pitchforks for the rich, declaring that “there should be no billionaires.” And on the right, Donald Trump ran for the presidency as a nationalist populist and won, defeating a candidate who was closely associated with “ the establishment.” Not until 2015 did real median wages recover to their 2007 level, and not until 2016 did real wages for the bottom 20th percentile recover.Īs typically happens, these economic ramifications from the crisis led to a surge in populism in the US. The story begins with the 2008 global financial crisis, which created so much slack in US labor markets that inflation-adjusted wages fell for the bottom half of workers for several years running. If she can navigate her premiership through its current choppy waters and into calmer seas, she might end up providing a model that American conservatives could follow. Meanwhile, the United States continues to wallow in it. ![]() This has prompted a debate in the crypto community on whether a decentralized social media might be the solution to all of the above.WASHINGTON, DC –The United Kingdom’s new prime minister, Liz Truss, is turning the page on self-destructive populism. Just a month ago, CryptoPotato reported that YouTube is shadowbanning Bitcoin-related videos as several content creators complained that their videos are impossible to locate. In actuality, the links lead to an article that cites a study, conducted by scientists at the University Hospital in Zurich on “Systemic and mucosal antibody secretion specific to SARS-CoV-2 during mild versus severe COVID-19.” It’s Not Just TwitterĬentralized social media have the authority to one-sidedly suspend, or flag content they deem is in violation of their Terms of Agreement. Moreover, it also warns that the link might lead to a site that “steals your password or other personal information, installs malicious software programs on your computer,” and so forth. ![]() Once again, the warning says that the content might be “potentially harmful” or in violation of Twitter’s Terms of Service. Just yesterday, the outlet published another article, covering a study on resistance to SARS-COV2, and that’s what users see when trying to open it. ![]() We have a dedicated appeals process for all account holders.” But Is It Really?ĭespite admittedly making a mistake, it appears that Twitter continues to flag some of ZeroHedge’s content. 133 days later, though, on Friday, June 12th, the news outlet was reinstated after Twitter reportedly admitted they “made an error in our enforcement action in this case.” A Twitter spokesperson told Bloomberg that “Based on additional context from the account holder in appeal, we have reinstated the account. At that time, ZeroHedge saw its account suspended. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |